← Back to Blog
Mobile

The Great Mobile Development Showdown: React Native vs Native vs Capacitor

Mobile development approaches have evolved significantly over the years. Let's examine the current state of React Native, Native development, and CapacitorJS to understand their strengths and limitations in 2024.

Native Development

Native development with Swift (iOS) and Kotlin (Android) remains the gold standard for mobile apps, offering:

  • Maximum performance and platform-specific optimizations
  • Immediate access to new platform features and APIs
  • Complete platform-specific debugging tools
  • Full control over the user experience
  • Excellent crash reporting and analytics

The main drawback is maintaining separate codebases for iOS and Android, which increases development time and cost.

React Native: A Strong Contender

React Native has matured into a robust framework that delivers real value:

  • High code reuse between platforms (typically 80%)
  • Strong performance for most application types
  • Rapid development with hot reload
  • Extensive third-party library ecosystem
  • Native code integration when needed

However, React Native does have limitations around complex animations and occasional challenges with native module integration.

CapacitorJS: The Web-First Approach

CapacitorJS leverages web technologies for mobile development:

  • Familiar web development stack
  • Built-in PWA capabilities
  • Simple native API access
  • Fast development cycles
  • Ideal for web-first companies

The main trade-off is reduced performance compared to native solutions, particularly for complex UI interactions.

Making an Informed Decision

Native development excels when:

  • Performance requirements are strict
  • Deep platform integration is necessary
  • Resources allow for platform-specific teams
  • Long-term maintainability is crucial

React Native is optimal when:

  • Time to market is critical
  • A single codebase is preferred
  • The team has React expertise
  • The app has standard UI patterns

CapacitorJS works best when:

  • Web development is the team's strength
  • Budget constraints exist
  • PWA support is required
  • The app primarily uses standard components

Conclusion

Based on current trends and capabilities, React Native offers the best balance for most projects. It provides near-native performance, excellent developer experience, and significant cost savings through code sharing. While native development remains superior for high-performance requirements, and Capacitor excels for web-first teams, React Native's maturity and ecosystem make it the most practical choice for modern mobile development.

The success of apps like Instagram (React Native), Shopify (React Native), and Discord (React Native) demonstrates that cross-platform solutions can deliver excellent user experiences at scale. Choose the technology that aligns with your team's expertise and project requirements, but don't discount React Native's proven track record.